20080829

thebigO

No mere president is going to put the country on the right path (whatever you think that is.) To a disturbing extent, elections serve to convince people they've had all the voice and choice they need, deserve, or are capable of exercising, so they'll stop clamoring and let those who already have power get on with using it.

Still, the choice of leader is informative about what kind of society people want to have, which can help you decide how better to share your ideas and ideals with them.
While there are no saviors, a president does have impact, and I think on the whole an Obama presidency would cause less harm and more good than a McCain presidency.

assoandsosays

There are roughly two motives in quoting someone. In one you expect the esteem for the person to lend credence to the words. In the other you expect the words to be judged on their own, and the attribution is merely giving credit where credit is due --and perhaps to affect the esteem for the person.
The first approach is authoritarian. The second is the ideal of rational discourse.

abortionsforall

The whole question of abortion just about goes away if we had perfect birth control. And what's perfect birth control? Something universal and affordable. Something not dependent on external technology. Something so women can accept or suppress pregnancy at will. Something built into the genes so every woman on the planet has it by right of birth and no kings, priests, prophets, patriarchs, commissars or high commanders can take it away.
Then the only remaining circumstances for abortion would be those cases where unexpected complications lead to grievous risks to the mother's life.

The lengths social conservatives in the early 20th century went to suppress contraceptives or even information on contraceptives and family planning advice serves as part of the proof social conservatism is evil. Maybe if the conservatives of today were more willing to openly condemn the evils of the conservatives of the past, I'd be more charitable about assuming today's conservatives are evil as well. But they won't. Learning that lesson would cost their fragile worldview too much to survive.

20080825

rateyourblogIQ

blog readability test

TV Reviews



Probably they just have it set to say everybody's is "genius." Makes people feel good and keeps people linking in.

ETA: oh horrors, my nice clean blog now has a picture in it.

20080819

littlethings

Batteries and other electronics are being built by viruses. Diesel fuel, or something like it, is being made with bacteria.

preservingelitism

I rattled off this comment to something on the Trib webpage a couple days back. After some thought I've decided I rather like the wording, so I'm putting it here rather than let it simply languish in the forgotten Trib archives.

::
"Elitist," apparently means anyone who thinks the people should put more thought into politics than just cheering whoever buys the most ad time during NASCAR to tell them how great they are just for being born in the USA. "Elitist" is anyone who thinks the people should think more about philosophy than merely internalizing whatever daddy and the preacher told them in childhood. "Elitist" is anyone who thinks people should care more about art and culture than merely deciding which summer blockbuster has the coolest explosions and which country/pop/hiphop star has the catchiest unchallenging tunes.

You're an "elitist" if you think the people ought to be anything more than easily manipulated pawns of the already wealthy and powerful.
::

20080810

gettin'elected

It occurs to me that if one is interested in the U.S. presidential elections, their major issues, and likely results, then the least relevant information is what the candidates themselves say. Look to the wisdom of the crowd, such as it is. Hear what people say about what people say about what people say about what the candidates say. Examine the textures of information and try to take the derivative of it all.

I don't think it's yet time to run for the hills, move to Sweden, sign up for Re-Ned-ucation, or wage bloody revolution.

20080808

justnicely.youknow

Oy, you know that hyperalert state where you're somewhat drunk and you focus and rebalance your sensory systems 'cause you know you can't quite trust your automatics, and then when you get home you can relax and so then the alcohol effects really come to your conscious attention? Yeah, me too.

Reggae still annoys me on radio, but it makes pretty decent bar live music.

Note to all musicians travelling to Utah: bring a fair sound artist along, 'cause you can't trust the club's sound guy to know shit around here.

20080805

expletivewindowsdeleted

So, back from my excursion with my family (had a great time, maybe I'll write about it later), I find that -not for the first time- my desktop computer has taken the opportunity of being left off for several days as a chance to fuck itself over. So now, after several unsuccessful attempts at repair and reinstallation, including -definitely not for the first time- a perfectly functional new XP install suddenly becoming unbootable and unrestorable after exposure to one of Microsoft's "critical security updates, I'm now writing this from my shiny new Ubuntu 8.04 installation.

Is that a run-on sentence? Or something else? Parenthetical statements and nested subordinate clauses just look to me like side branches to a no-longer-merely-linear sentence.

This isn't my first foray into linux territory, having previously played with Xubuntu's Fawn and Gibbon varieties, and briefly with Debian and Stormix years ago, and of course my laptop is an Eee. And I'll be running linux and nothing but until some future time when I delude myself into thinking a dual boot would be cool and maybe I can coax this ancient computer into running games again. (Games, and certain proprietary programs in certain professional industries, are the only thing you might require Windows for.)

I find any of the desktop-oriented linux distros is much easier to install and use than Windows. I have to delicately tweak and coax XP for hours to get a desktop environment I like, with a high risk of failure, whereas a linux liveCD can give me a comfortable working install in half an hour or so. This in spite of my slipstreamed updated XP install disc. (If you are inclined to play with windows, I highly recommend getting the latest service pack and your own pick of relevent updates in download form -the one where Microsoft says "only for IT professionals installing on many computers"- and using either nLite or vLite to burn a fully-updated Windows install disc. This will cut your Windows setup time in half --to a mere two or three hours.)
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Additionally, for clarification I grant that "unauthorized commercial use" generally only applies if the work itself is the object of exchange, and specifically that a site with click-through or advertising income is welcome to share it (attrib, no-deriv, otherwise non-com), so long as the work shared is openly available to all and not subject to sale or paid access. Any elements of my works that might be original to others are Fair Use, and you are left to your own to make sure your own use of them is likewise.