20100722

groundcontroltothomaspaine

Thomas Paine was an interesting and critical figure in the origins of America and the development of modern ideals of freedom and democracy.

Glenn Beck thinks he understands Paine really well. Count it among the man's many not-so-charming delusions. I do eventually mean to read this thing, taking advantage of the local municipal socialist book-sharing program (library), though probably not the same one Beck went to to learn all government services are wicked and wrong. Hopefully it will turn out better than my attempt to read Ann Coulter.

John Perkins has a considerably better grasp of Paine. Perkins is descended from Paine and has learned some hard moral lessons on the nature of power and control. He knows that authoritarian control structures in capitalist business are no less odious than authoritarian control structures in government, that the two are often deeply intertwined and that this is NOT a result of government corrupting honest capitalism but of the corruption inherent in all desire to control and exploit for profit and power. Glenn Beck by contrast only remembers to detest authoritarian government if it fails to make the appropriate "conservative values" nonsense noise, and like most pseudo-libertarians, is inexplicably more angered by things government does FOR people than by things government does TO people. (Often this takes the form of detesting those labelled as weak or dependent, veneration of metaphorical Strength being a characteristic fascist value.)

Susan Jacoby also understands Paine quite well. Her excellent book embraces Paine's contribution to America's true moral foundations, and continued influence on all movements to bring about a better, freer world.

But the best source on Paine is Thomas Paine himself, in Common Sense, Rights of Man, Age of Reason, and numerous other writings, pamphlets, and letters, he explains quite clearly what he stands for. Apologists like to pretend it was a different or changed Thomas Paine who wrote Age of Reason, but the same "spirit," the same principles of freedom of mind and body for all and the free pursuit of truth unfettered by orthodoxy, authority, or dogma underlies all his writings. It's all public domain, so you can find it on Project Gutenberg and numerous university course text pages, or in several printed editions if you like. Though far from the first freethinker, he is among the finest.

20100712

differenceofdegreenotkind

A man says, "I have a gun and I will shoot you unless you paint your house red."

A terrorist message declares, "we have bombs we will detonate in your city unless you paint all your homes red."

An interstellar invasion fleet announces, "we can manipulate matter to the subatomic level, and we will tear apart your Sun unless you comply by painting all domiciles red."

A Being walks the earth in shining robes, with secrets beyond time behind his eyes, the words come into your mind, "I can make and unmake universes, I will inflict eternal torment, pain, suffering, and fire on all who do not swear that red is the only Holy color for the homes of the faithful."

20100705

unknownpoliclimate

I don't think people should get to call themselves "skeptics" when their "skepticism" is rooted not in genuine doubt but in a devoted faith in Party position statements and Bernays/Hayek/Friedman's wilful misinterpretation of Adam Smith. Yes, that sentence is about climate change.

Genuine skepticism is deep epistemological questioning into whether we could really know what we think we know, and whether others can really know what they claim to know. One must question oneself most of all. Simply asserting others are wrong, skepticism is not.
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Additionally, for clarification I grant that "unauthorized commercial use" generally only applies if the work itself is the object of exchange, and specifically that a site with click-through or advertising income is welcome to share it (attrib, no-deriv, otherwise non-com), so long as the work shared is openly available to all and not subject to sale or paid access. Any elements of my works that might be original to others are Fair Use, and you are left to your own to make sure your own use of them is likewise.