Been hearing this over the last hour on the BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8714085.stm
20100531
20100506
seisdemayo
I don't think it makes sense to argue "It's the law" or "they broke the law" when some of the major points under contention are "is the law just?" and "what ought to be the law?". It's also odd, though more disappointing than surprising, that people who claim to dislike big government and the threat of government tyranny are just fine with that government being extra strict toward someone they don't like. No, this isn't just about Arizona, or even just about immigration.
Labels:
peripheral philosophy,
politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)